Cut Celebrities from Your Mental Diet

July 21st, 2009

Vain Celebrity

The English have their royalty, the Japanese have their gadgets, and here in the United States, we have celebrities. Lots and lots of celebrities.

Sports stars, actors, musicians…at some point in their careers, they become less a person and more an idea. Each and every one of them personifies a different niche; a different market segmentation.

Growing up in Missouri, I knew people who were absolutely obsessed with celebrities. They would go to church and pray and then go home to sit in front of the TV (their real place of worship) and turn on E! True Hollywood Stories or log on to Perez Hilton to read the latest about who got in a catfight with whom at which club in Los Angeles over the weekend. And what they were wearing (and how in or out of style it was).

And that’s in the Midwest, culturally and geographically hundreds of miles from the action! To really understand America’s obsession with stars, you have to live closer to the epicenter, and if celebrities are gods, Los Angeles is Mount Olympus.

Having lived in LA for the past few years, I’ve found that 1) the number of people who are obsessed with celebrities in LA is much higher than in Missouri, 2) many of these people are obsessed because they believe they will someday be (or be dating) a celebrity, and 3) they seem to have just as much chance of becoming celebrities with their $300 jeans and $200 haircuts as the Croc-wearing, McDonald’s-eating folk back in Missouri.

“But so what?” you’re likely shouting at anyone within hearing range. “Celebrities are entertainers! They’re harmless!”

The real problem that I have with celebrities is that most of the people we hold in such high regard aren’t very good role models. Oh wow, he can act! She looks good half-naked on the cover of magazines! Children, look! Imitate!

Then again, people aren’t looking for role models when they page through the latest celebrity gossip rag; they’re looking for scandal. It’s like a soap opera; one that the PR people are orchestrating and the people of America are entranced by.

Celebrity has become Soma (an escapist drug) for the American people. We’re so distracted by what Brittany is up to this week that we don’t have time to keep up with current events, politics, art, literature, etc etc etc (you know, all that non-sexy stuff).

The real shame is that celebrity in itself is not wrong; it’s just America’s approach to it that’s failing us.

If little girls were flipping out over the latest literary achievement by Nobel Laureate Doris Lessing and little boys were getting excited about new findings related to entangled particles, then we probably wouldn’t be suffering through our current crises (rushing to close the technology gap with other countries, suffering under a failing educational system, enduring a horrendous economic crisis, etc).

So what can do you change a nationwide trend?

You can start by changing your own activities and influencing others by example. Any time you catch yourself turning on some mind-candy TV show or paging through People or reaching for a tabloid, redirect your attention to something productive and fulfilling. I’ll bet there are a million and one things you’ve been telling yourself you would accomplish this year that you haven’t even started on. What better way to use this reclaimed time than by investing it in those goals?

Turning off the TV can also help A LOT. I’ve been TV-less for over two years, and in that time I’ve enjoyed massive amounts of productive time that would have otherwise been drained by the boob tube.

In the end, take it from a marketing guy: all of these celebrities, at the end of the day, exist only to sell you something. They are themselves a product created to sell other products. If you approach them like you would any other commercial (that is, changing the channel to see what else is on), you’ll be doing yourself a service.

What do you think? Are you a celebriphile? Can’t stand them? Share your comments below!

Share? Share!
  • RSS
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine




  • I plan to start eliminating everything I don't need. Much thanks to you and your minimalist teachings. Flat screen tv, ps3, among many other things are complete time sucks.

    It is so sad the effect celebrities and pop culture have on society today. The young are easily influenced and if not for strong family values and good role models many will continue along this negative path.

    Good post Colin. I like how you tweet some of the older ones that I have missed.

    Rob
  • Nice to find this kind of content, lovely!
  • Good advice.
  • @Amy: Definitely not! Re-reading it now, I can see it how it could read that way, but I certainly wasn't implying that those interests are ALL that little boys and girls should be interested in, but rather that each is an example of something that would be more valuable and fulfilling than an obsession with celebrity and the culture that comes with it.

    Thanks for pointing that out and allowing me to clarify for anyone else who might have been wondering, as well!
  • Amy
    Surely you don't mean to restrict little girls to English studies and shuffle the boys off into the sciences? While Lessing should be read more widely (although perhaps not by "little" children of either sex, given her penchant for distopian tales that reveal the shattered and ostracizing nature of our own societies) there is no need to follow the path of Oxbridge dons and denote that realm as belonging purely to the feminine. Likewise little boys should not feel it necessary to prove their manhood in the realms of science but instead should feel free to embrace their inner artist, poet, historian, etc.
  • @Brian: sounds like someone is getting kickbacks from Crocs :) But seriously, my beef isn't with Crocs (though I think they are an obscene eyesore), it's with celebrity.

    Strangely enough, there was just a huge volleyball competition in Manhattan Beach that was sponsored by Crocs. It was hilarious to see them posing as an athletic brand.

    @Dwight: I'll work on the celebrity invasion of Twitter in a future article!

    @J.D. Meier: Definitely. This is why it's a good idea to maintain opinion leader status if you can, so that when you have something you feel strongly about, you can hopefully make a difference without being pushy or making enemies.

    @braeden young: Right? It boggles my mind every time I meet someone who couldn't tell you where North Korea is, but could tell you the annotated history of Bradgelina's relationship.

    Thanks for the great comments!
  • braeden young
    You just put into words what has been troubling my mind for years. I just don't understand why we give a damn about the details of their lives.
  • I agree - leading by example is one of the best ways to influence. You obviously get better results if you're an opinion leader.
  • You're right. Crocs are ugly. So is the way we idolize celebrities. Great post. Next you gotta convince us to stop following them on twitter.
  • Crocs are great. they are a low cost flipflop alternative, which are anti-microbial and come in a variety of colors. they are easy to slip on and off, can double as a shower shoe in public places, make great galoshes when it's raining and can be handy for the beach. (Also they are great for hiding ugly feet like mine)
    So while I agree that $300 jeans and $200 haircuts are outrageous, crocs my midwest originating friend, are a simple solution to stresses of everyday footwear.
blog comments powered by Disqus