Dear Bangalore Polo Club: You Screwed Up
The Bar
There’s a place that I really liked here in Christchurch called the Bangalore Polo Club.
It’s apparently fairly new, and it stands out really well from the other bars on ‘the strip,’ mostly because it has a carefully cultivated element of cool. The decor is beautiful, the drinks are great, and the attention to detail when it comes to their image is really obvious. The staff runs around in polo uniforms and they even have their own team, The Badgers.
Clever clever clever, and yet they’ve lost me as a customer because of one big foul-up that was due not to their look or feel, but their customer service.
The Foul Up
Mid-April, I decided to have my 25th birthday after-Laser Strike drinking festivities at the Polo Club. A double-handful of people showed up and we were having a great time, ordering more and more drinks, slapping backs, telling stories. Things were just as they should be, until I got a text from a friend who had left to meet her boyfriend as he made his way over to join us. She had left the bar to meet him halfway.
Usually leaving a bar wouldn’t be a mistake, but in this particular instance, my friend happened to not be wearing fancy shoes. Hell, most of us weren’t dressed up at all – t-shirts and jeans were the standard attire – but apparently the Polo Club has very strict rules about shoes. ‘No trainers (sneakers),’ said the bouncer.
Looking around I noticed many other people wearing similarly ‘unsuitable’ footwear, but the bouncers had apparently not been paying as close attention when they walked in, just like they hadn’t noticed my friend’s shoes when she came in the first time. No matter, I figure, it’s a chill place, so I’m sure they’ll make an exception.
‘Come on man, she was just in here. And look, you can’t even see her shoes, they’re covered up by her pants.’ This was true…all you could tell, upon VERY close inspection, was that her shoes were dark brown. They could easily pass for brown leather shoes.
‘Sorry, can’t do it. It’s against the rules. No trainers.’
Since they obviously didn’t care about the ridiculousness of the orders they were following, I decided to appeal to the more practical side of their brains.
‘Seriously, it’s my birthday. I’ve got a group of people in there and we’re ordering a lot of drinks. If she can’t come in, we’re going to another bar. We’d like to stay here, but, well, I’m sure you can see the predicament.’
‘Can’t do it. Boss’ rules.’
At this point I was fuming, partially because they bouncers were obviously enjoying the power trip, and partially because I hate to see a business that does so many things well do something so badly.
After finishing the drinks we had already ordered (and canceling the other orders we had made that hadn’t been filled), we moved on to another bar where we spent a whole lot of money and drew more people in as the night progressed.
What the Bangalore Polo Club did wasn’t technically wrong, but it was a VERY foolish thing for them to do.
The Lesson
I’m going to assume that the bouncer thing was not an anomaly here, because their response meant that either 1) the BPC hires pricks, which I don’t think was the case, because up until that point the people there had been pleasant enough, or 2) management is screwing up by not empowering the staff.
If the (more likely) latter case is true, it all comes down to giving the staff the ability to do right by the customer. You can talk all you want about giving customers a good experience, but if you don’t allow the staff to make case-by-case decisions on their own, you’re essentially telling them to fly without wings.
For example, the night of my birthday should not have resulted in my friends and I having to bail and go to another bar. If my friend had been stopped at the door at all (which I don’t think she should have been in the first place, but let’s assume they actually continue to periodically enforce the ridiculous shoe-rule), as soon as the bouncers found out that she was with a big group, a BIRTHDAY group no less, and was wearing shoes that would not have been identified as trainers to the casual observer, they should have been able to say ‘Okay, but next time wear something with more heel’ and let her back in to join us.
Hell, even in the worst case they should have felt like they could take the initiative and said ‘Well, we can’t make that decision, but let me get my boss over here and see what he thinks.’ Then the manager could have strolled over, declared that they would make an exception this one time, and not only would we have not hated the place, but rather felt extra-special, soft-and-fluffy thoughts about them. They did us a favor! They’re human, like us! Let’s come here all the time (and wear extra-nice shoes, because we don’t want to offend our new friends)!
Instead, here we are. The worst kind of offense is caused by the people you love, and the same holds true with businesses. Where once I would hold every business meeting and casual outing at the Polo Club, now I avoid it like the plague. Why would I go out of my way to help keep a place that so casually insults me and my friends in business?
Whether you run a bar, a small business, a corporation or a booth at your local craft fair, the bigger the fan that you offend, the more harsh (and vocal) a critic they will turn out to be.
Treat your customers like you’d want to be treated. There’s always a chance for rifts like this to be mended, but it’s much easier to just not let them happen at all.
You do realise that when a bouncer says "shoes" (or whatever) that 50% of the time it really is just a coded way of saying we don't want you here but we're not saying the real reason right to your face.
However, having said that... I do completely agree with you that they could've handled that a LOT better. Heh, that is bouncers for you :-)
You do realise that when a bouncer says "shoes" (or whatever) that 50% of the time it really is just a coded way of saying we don't want you here but we're not saying the real reason right to your face.
However, having said that... I do completely agree with you that they could've handled that a LOT better. Heh, that is bouncers for you :-)
Heh heh! If only the knew that you write words on the internet and those words influence many others.
I wonder if they will find this post and respond?
But you never know they might actually take your concerns on board :)
Yeah its funny how that one keeps cropping up around NZ & Aus, they love the power trip and i bet if management knew how petty they were being id say they would probably be quite dissapointed about it.
Well, I certainly won't be going to the Bangalore Polo Club in Christchurch, New Zealand anytime soon!
But seriously, rules should have a purpose behind them, like public safety perhaps. You have to assume here that the rule is in place to maintain a certain image so that the club does better business. In this instance, the rule has lost them business, clearly defeating the purpose of the rule. You are right, Colin, the bouncers have to have freedom to be able to make that logical inference.
They are definitely losing business there. What do they have in mind?
You were right to leave. They weren't being nice. They were being sticklers. Why put up with it?
I have seen this sort of behaviour from bouncers all too often. Management employ them to be thugs, so they act the part. What they should be employing is burly people that are empowered to make decisions within a set of guidelines. Management relinquishes a little power, but gains a whole lot more through the intelligence of their staff. In fact, the same sort of behaviours thrive throughout many organisations where managers want to control every detail of their organisation. It's great lesson for everyone with staff!
Interesting comment @wasabhi. I wasn't aware of the background/history potentially linked to the name. I wonder if the owners of the bar are?
It'd be interesting to find out...
Interesting write-up ... and its a sad indictment of the all too common, inflexible and overly judicious rules at (ego centric) organisations that want to portray an image based on such ridiculous superficial measures. Shoes...whatever...
My contention with the Bangalore Polo Club is its name. I'm of Indian descent and origin. I find the name conjures up too many connotations of British Raj overlords ... call me overly sensitive. I hate the idea of walking into this bar given its name, the number of people in Christchurch who wouldn't even know where Bangalore is, and who would not know the association of this name with an era of oppression and bitter bitter times for the large population of India. Again, I am probably being overly sensitive...
I'll be at The Twisted Hop too ... most likely at the same table as @gold while we talk about a broad range of topics, wear wtf we like, look as we do and stand proudly as a community of people who are aware of each other ... and who celebrate our diversity.
Hey Colin,
There's always The Twisted Hop. Nice place, friendly staff, no dress code, my local. The beer isn't the cheapest but it's made on the premises and is very good.
As you know, I've had a dry month. That ends this Saturday. I'm planning on working from the hop for the afternoon if you're in the area.
I've been getting a lot more sensitive to customer service recently... Even when it's kind of arbitrary, it can do a lot for how people feel about your store or overall brand. For example, I'm obviously in a position where I'm just browsing in fancy stores (and look it) but if I go into Cartier the staff are always really nice and offer to show me things anyway, where other similar stores they're kind of snooty. They're not technically losing or gaining my business in the moment, but in the future if I'm looking to buy something, I'm probably more likely to want to go back to Cartier. Even if it's just a subtle feeling that people develop about a place, they tend to pass that on to friends through recommendations etc.
So long rambly comment short, I agree with you absolutely that the little details of customer service really count.
Too bad, sounds like the kind of place I would like. But that is a very stupid rule, well even with the rule the lack of power to choose is even worst.
I guess this kind of practice can be very regular in some places, where they just enforce a practice without really thinking about it. Hell, I bet with all the drinks you ordered just for that occasion sums up one of their possible best nights ever.
Too bad they lost a great customer with all the networking power you have.
Have you ever seen "The Inbetweeners" on BBC? Hilarious show that touched on your issue of "no trainers". Hilarious and may make the whole experience a little better? Not sure, but made me think about it.
Hi Colin! Been reading your blog for a while now, it's wonderful.
Your story reminds me of so many nights out in Sydney (where, incidentally, many of the bouncers are from NZ - but that may well just be a coincidence). These rules about footwear, dress etc. are always selectively enforced and the bouncers love enforcing them, but only when they want to. After many years of occasional disappointment my friends and I realised the only way to get around it was to find a quiet pub with no rules (and cheap beer) and get enough people going there to make it cool!
I hope you have some similar luck in Christchurch over the coming months.
Ambrose
Heh heh! If only the knew that you write words on the internet and those words influence many others.
I wonder if they will find this post and respond?
But you never know they might actually take your concerns on board :)
Yeah its funny how that one keeps cropping up around NZ & Aus, they love the power trip and i bet if management knew how petty they were being id say they would probably be quite dissapointed about it.
Well, I certainly won't be going to the Bangalore Polo Club in Christchurch, New Zealand anytime soon!
But seriously, rules should have a purpose behind them, like public safety perhaps. You have to assume here that the rule is in place to maintain a certain image so that the club does better business. In this instance, the rule has lost them business, clearly defeating the purpose of the rule. You are right, Colin, the bouncers have to have freedom to be able to make that logical inference.
They are definitely losing business there. What do they have in mind?
You were right to leave. They weren't being nice. They were being sticklers. Why put up with it?
I have seen this sort of behaviour from bouncers all too often. Management employ them to be thugs, so they act the part. What they should be employing is burly people that are empowered to make decisions within a set of guidelines. Management relinquishes a little power, but gains a whole lot more through the intelligence of their staff. In fact, the same sort of behaviours thrive throughout many organisations where managers want to control every detail of their organisation. It's great lesson for everyone with staff!
Interesting comment @wasabhi. I wasn't aware of the background/history potentially linked to the name. I wonder if the owners of the bar are?
It'd be interesting to find out...
Interesting write-up ... and its a sad indictment of the all too common, inflexible and overly judicious rules at (ego centric) organisations that want to portray an image based on such ridiculous superficial measures. Shoes...whatever...
My contention with the Bangalore Polo Club is its name. I'm of Indian descent and origin. I find the name conjures up too many connotations of British Raj overlords ... call me overly sensitive. I hate the idea of walking into this bar given its name, the number of people in Christchurch who wouldn't even know where Bangalore is, and who would not know the association of this name with an era of oppression and bitter bitter times for the large population of India. Again, I am probably being overly sensitive...
I'll be at The Twisted Hop too ... most likely at the same table as @gold while we talk about a broad range of topics, wear wtf we like, look as we do and stand proudly as a community of people who are aware of each other ... and who celebrate our diversity.
Hey Colin,
There's always The Twisted Hop. Nice place, friendly staff, no dress code, my local. The beer isn't the cheapest but it's made on the premises and is very good.
As you know, I've had a dry month. That ends this Saturday. I'm planning on working from the hop for the afternoon if you're in the area.
I've been getting a lot more sensitive to customer service recently... Even when it's kind of arbitrary, it can do a lot for how people feel about your store or overall brand. For example, I'm obviously in a position where I'm just browsing in fancy stores (and look it) but if I go into Cartier the staff are always really nice and offer to show me things anyway, where other similar stores they're kind of snooty. They're not technically losing or gaining my business in the moment, but in the future if I'm looking to buy something, I'm probably more likely to want to go back to Cartier. Even if it's just a subtle feeling that people develop about a place, they tend to pass that on to friends through recommendations etc.
So long rambly comment short, I agree with you absolutely that the little details of customer service really count.
Too bad, sounds like the kind of place I would like. But that is a very stupid rule, well even with the rule the lack of power to choose is even worst.
I guess this kind of practice can be very regular in some places, where they just enforce a practice without really thinking about it. Hell, I bet with all the drinks you ordered just for that occasion sums up one of their possible best nights ever.
Too bad they lost a great customer with all the networking power you have.
Have you ever seen "The Inbetweeners" on BBC? Hilarious show that touched on your issue of "no trainers". Hilarious and may make the whole experience a little better? Not sure, but made me think about it.
Hi Colin! Been reading your blog for a while now, it's wonderful.
Your story reminds me of so many nights out in Sydney (where, incidentally, many of the bouncers are from NZ - but that may well just be a coincidence). These rules about footwear, dress etc. are always selectively enforced and the bouncers love enforcing them, but only when they want to. After many years of occasional disappointment my friends and I realised the only way to get around it was to find a quiet pub with no rules (and cheap beer) and get enough people going there to make it cool!
I hope you have some similar luck in Christchurch over the coming months.
Ambrose
Hi Colin! Been reading your blog for a while now, it’s wonderful.
Your story reminds me of so many nights out in Sydney (where, incidentally, many of the bouncers are from NZ – but that may well just be a coincidence). These rules about footwear, dress etc. are always selectively enforced and the bouncers love enforcing them, but only when they want to. After many years of occasional disappointment my friends and I realised the only way to get around it was to find a quiet pub with no rules (and cheap beer) and get enough people going there to make it cool!
I hope you have some similar luck in Christchurch over the coming months.
Ambrose
Hi Colin! Been reading your blog for a while now, it’s wonderful.
Your story reminds me of so many nights out in Sydney (where, incidentally, many of the bouncers are from NZ – but that may well just be a coincidence). These rules about footwear, dress etc. are always selectively enforced and the bouncers love enforcing them, but only when they want to. After many years of occasional disappointment my friends and I realised the only way to get around it was to find a quiet pub with no rules (and cheap beer) and get enough people going there to make it cool!
I hope you have some similar luck in Christchurch over the coming months.
Ambrose
Have you ever seen “The Inbetweeners” on BBC? Hilarious show that touched on your issue of “no trainers”. Hilarious and may make the whole experience a little better? Not sure, but made me think about it.
Have you ever seen “The Inbetweeners” on BBC? Hilarious show that touched on your issue of “no trainers”. Hilarious and may make the whole experience a little better? Not sure, but made me think about it.
Too bad, sounds like the kind of place I would like. But that is a very stupid rule, well even with the rule the lack of power to choose is even worst.
I guess this kind of practice can be very regular in some places, where they just enforce a practice without really thinking about it. Hell, I bet with all the drinks you ordered just for that occasion sums up one of their possible best nights ever.
Too bad they lost a great customer with all the networking power you have.
Too bad, sounds like the kind of place I would like. But that is a very stupid rule, well even with the rule the lack of power to choose is even worst.
I guess this kind of practice can be very regular in some places, where they just enforce a practice without really thinking about it. Hell, I bet with all the drinks you ordered just for that occasion sums up one of their possible best nights ever.
Too bad they lost a great customer with all the networking power you have.
I’ve been getting a lot more sensitive to customer service recently… Even when it’s kind of arbitrary, it can do a lot for how people feel about your store or overall brand. For example, I’m obviously in a position where I’m just browsing in fancy stores (and look it) but if I go into Cartier the staff are always really nice and offer to show me things anyway, where other similar stores they’re kind of snooty. They’re not technically losing or gaining my business in the moment, but in the future if I’m looking to buy something, I’m probably more likely to want to go back to Cartier. Even if it’s just a subtle feeling that people develop about a place, they tend to pass that on to friends through recommendations etc.
So long rambly comment short, I agree with you absolutely that the little details of customer service really count.
I’ve been getting a lot more sensitive to customer service recently… Even when it’s kind of arbitrary, it can do a lot for how people feel about your store or overall brand. For example, I’m obviously in a position where I’m just browsing in fancy stores (and look it) but if I go into Cartier the staff are always really nice and offer to show me things anyway, where other similar stores they’re kind of snooty. They’re not technically losing or gaining my business in the moment, but in the future if I’m looking to buy something, I’m probably more likely to want to go back to Cartier. Even if it’s just a subtle feeling that people develop about a place, they tend to pass that on to friends through recommendations etc.
So long rambly comment short, I agree with you absolutely that the little details of customer service really count.
Hey Colin,
There’s always The Twisted Hop. Nice place, friendly staff, no dress code, my local. The beer isn’t the cheapest but it’s made on the premises and is very good.
As you know, I’ve had a dry month. That ends this Saturday. I’m planning on working from the hop for the afternoon if you’re in the area.
Hey Colin,
There’s always The Twisted Hop. Nice place, friendly staff, no dress code, my local. The beer isn’t the cheapest but it’s made on the premises and is very good.
As you know, I’ve had a dry month. That ends this Saturday. I’m planning on working from the hop for the afternoon if you’re in the area.
Interesting write-up … and its a sad indictment of the all too common, inflexible and overly judicious rules at (ego centric) organisations that want to portray an image based on such ridiculous superficial measures. Shoes…whatever…
My contention with the Bangalore Polo Club is its name. I’m of Indian descent and origin. I find the name conjures up too many connotations of British Raj overlords … call me overly sensitive. I hate the idea of walking into this bar given its name, the number of people in Christchurch who wouldn’t even know where Bangalore is, and who would not know the association of this name with an era of oppression and bitter bitter times for the large population of India. Again, I am probably being overly sensitive…
I’ll be at The Twisted Hop too … most likely at the same table as @gold while we talk about a broad range of topics, wear wtf we like, look as we do and stand proudly as a community of people who are aware of each other … and who celebrate our diversity.
Interesting write-up … and its a sad indictment of the all too common, inflexible and overly judicious rules at (ego centric) organisations that want to portray an image based on such ridiculous superficial measures. Shoes…whatever…
My contention with the Bangalore Polo Club is its name. I’m of Indian descent and origin. I find the name conjures up too many connotations of British Raj overlords … call me overly sensitive. I hate the idea of walking into this bar given its name, the number of people in Christchurch who wouldn’t even know where Bangalore is, and who would not know the association of this name with an era of oppression and bitter bitter times for the large population of India. Again, I am probably being overly sensitive…
I’ll be at The Twisted Hop too … most likely at the same table as @gold while we talk about a broad range of topics, wear wtf we like, look as we do and stand proudly as a community of people who are aware of each other … and who celebrate our diversity.
Interesting comment @wasabhi. I wasn’t aware of the background/history potentially linked to the name. I wonder if the owners of the bar are?
It’d be interesting to find out…
Interesting comment @wasabhi. I wasn’t aware of the background/history potentially linked to the name. I wonder if the owners of the bar are?
It’d be interesting to find out…
I have seen this sort of behaviour from bouncers all too often. Management employ them to be thugs, so they act the part. What they should be employing is burly people that are empowered to make decisions within a set of guidelines. Management relinquishes a little power, but gains a whole lot more through the intelligence of their staff. In fact, the same sort of behaviours thrive throughout many organisations where managers want to control every detail of their organisation. It’s great lesson for everyone with staff!
I have seen this sort of behaviour from bouncers all too often. Management employ them to be thugs, so they act the part. What they should be employing is burly people that are empowered to make decisions within a set of guidelines. Management relinquishes a little power, but gains a whole lot more through the intelligence of their staff. In fact, the same sort of behaviours thrive throughout many organisations where managers want to control every detail of their organisation. It’s great lesson for everyone with staff!
They are definitely losing business there. What do they have in mind?
You were right to leave. They weren’t being nice. They were being sticklers. Why put up with it?
They are definitely losing business there. What do they have in mind?
You were right to leave. They weren’t being nice. They were being sticklers. Why put up with it?
Well, I certainly won’t be going to the Bangalore Polo Club in Christchurch, New Zealand anytime soon!
But seriously, rules should have a purpose behind them, like public safety perhaps. You have to assume here that the rule is in place to maintain a certain image so that the club does better business. In this instance, the rule has lost them business, clearly defeating the purpose of the rule. You are right, Colin, the bouncers have to have freedom to be able to make that logical inference.
Yeah its funny how that one keeps cropping up around NZ & Aus, they love the power trip and i bet if management knew how petty they were being id say they would probably be quite dissapointed about it.
Heh heh! If only the knew that you write words on the internet and those words influence many others.
I wonder if they will find this post and respond?
But you never know they might actually take your concerns on board :)
You do realise that when a bouncer says “shoes” (or whatever) that 50% of the time it really is just a coded way of saying we don’t want you here but we’re not saying the real reason right to your face.
However, having said that… I do completely agree with you that they could’ve handled that a LOT better. Heh, that is bouncers for you :-)
Its the bouncers and Im guessing theyve brought the same pricks to Wellingtom


Its the bouncers and Im guessing theyve brought the same pricks to Wellingtom
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like